Today's lecture presented assignment 2 and what is expected for our final delivery of the last ever design assignment. It's all pretty daunting for me and I'm a little bit worried about how ambiguous the criteria are.
Once again it's all about the 'story' we present and how we can fit an architectural entity into a context, which I think is a really cool idea, it's all about being visual about it, which is basically what architecture is anyway.
Yasu has told us he wants the future scenario to be set in 2025 though not the 2050's as we'd originally projected so that's a bit worrying at first. Looking at how we're going to respond to technology and the future in the next 10-15 years. It's not really the angle I was thinking I'd approach this from, from the first assignment for me it was more about the community and the resilience and not the whiz bang gadgets that we'll have in the future.
The 'Convenience Store' video he showed us was interesting but strange, it went down that path of strange future gadgets that might be sold but the whole pattern of the convenience store hadn't really changed, which I don't find very realistic. I think I'll stick with all my climate and community based stuff at Woodford anyway.
Presenting:
Script = "the plot" - giving a visual story and context to my scenario
- developing a realistic story
- refining the context of project 1, being unique and imaginative
- having a well rounded future where all aspects are covered
Stage = "the architecture" - responding to the needs of the citizens in my scenario
- solving problems of the future
- access and use of the building
- what draws people there
- understanding of sustainability & construction
Scenes = "value & relevance" - showing physical and psychological context
- identification & connection with community
- first person experience
- private and personal scales of interior
No comments:
Post a Comment